I've been brewing a lot for competitions lately. One thing I've found is that I tend to brew differently for judging than I would for my own tastes. Competition beers are judged by
categories, which by definition provide guidelines where the beer should fall within. Typically there is some leeway, where a beer might push certain aspects (like bitterness, gravity, or ABV) but generally still falls within guidelines. One consequence of this model is that some styles can get stymied, particularly in specific regions. Take Pale Ales and IPA's in the Western region of the US. Left coasters tend to be hop heads, and often the more bitter the better the beer (within reason of course). Hop character also tends to be dominated by Cascade (or some other citrusy variety). For my tastes I like less grapefruit and citrus character in my ales, so a few weeks ago I made a Pale Ale all for me (and I won't be sending it off for judging). I used a blend of Willamette and Columbus. I really like the contribution of Willamette hops, I find them a little spicy and slightly floral and a little vegetal. I call it
"My beer Dammit" Pale Ale, and it's on tap right now. The hop profile really suits my tastes with a background bitterness complimented by a pungent flavor from the Columbus. I just know this will be one of those beers that runs out far too soon.